Showing posts with label gender in YA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender in YA. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

YA Guy Interviews... CHRISTINE KOHLER (plus a giveaway)!

If you read YA Guy's review from last week, you'll know I'm totally in love with Christine Kohler's YA debut, NO SURRENDER SOLDIER. For today's follow-up, Christine was nice enough to answer some questions of mine, and also to alert me to a couple giveaways of her book (see the links at the end).

YA Guy: You’ve published widely as a journalist, a picture story book author, poetry and more. What made you decide to publish a novel for Young Adults?

Christine Kohler: I’ve always written in multiple genres and markets. Some professors criticized me for not focusing on just one. Today experts call that “building a platform.” But editors published my work in those different genres and markets, so that encouraged me not to limit myself. I was an editor and copy editor for a Hearst daily for several years when I started writing novels. I think I did so for a couple of reasons. One, there were stories I wanted to tell that could only be told as fiction, and in the longer form. Two, it was a challenge to write and publish novels. I needed to keep challenging myself as a writer.

YAG: No Surrender Soldier is a historical novel, based on the true story of a Japanese soldier, Shoichi Yokoi, who spent nearly three decades hiding in the jungles of Guam. What drew you to this story?

CK: I worked as a political reporter and foreign correspondent for Gannet, covering the West Pacific. I had lived in Japan, Guam and Hawaii for nearly a decade. While living and traveling throughout Pacific-Asia I was able to visit WWII battle sites and study aspects of the war in the Pacific Theatre firsthand. The courage of people on all sides in the face of horrendous atrocities and deprivation moved me deeply. Researching and writing No Surrender Soldier came out of my effort to try to understand why people do what they do under extreme circumstances.

YAG: How much time did it take you to do the research for No Surrender Soldier?

CK: It’s hard to put a time on my research. When I was a journalist in the Pacific I never thought about writing a novel. Studying WWII just came from a reverence for the people who fought and my natural curiosity. (When I was growing up, my dad took me to Civil War battle sites and told me stories about that war. On my blog I also wrote about how my dad read to me war literature as a child. My dad had served in the US Navy during WWII when he was only 16 years old.) I had brought a Guam high school history book back to the U.S. Mainland when I moved back, and years later I picked it up and read it, along with other books about Shoichi Yokoi and WWII on Guam.

YAG: One of the things I loved about No Surrender Soldier was the relationship between the narrator, 15-year-old Kiko, and two men from the World War II era: his grandfather and the stranded Japanese soldier. Tell us something about those relationships. Why were they important to you? Why are they important to Kiko?

CK: When I wrote the first draft of No Surrender Soldier, the relationship between Kiko and his grandfather is as it stands now in the finished book. It never changed. I’m really not sure where Tatan bihu San Nicolas (Kiko’s grandfather) sprang from. But I do know why I understood his personality and dementia. When I was in graduate school, I did media relations for a long term care community that has one of the best Alzheimer’s units in the country. When I wrote my story I was just telling a story. But in hindsight, I guess it was the best choice to give Kiko a close relationship with a man--his tatan--who went through hell trying to protect his family--and failed--during the Japanese occupation of Guam.

All three men are stuck. The grandfather tests Kiko in a rite of passage, with his father’s blessing. However, because of the dementia worsening, there is also a changing of roles, from protector to dependent and from dependent to protector. Isamu Seto, the WWII soldier, is also stuck emotionally, physically, psychologically, and spiritually. That’s all I can say without giving away spoilers. But those who read No Surrender Soldier will be able to see why it is a classic coming-of-age novel and why the Kirkus reviewer wrote, “Both characters form new understandings when they encounter one another.”
      
YAG: Another thing I loved about your book was how seriously and respectfully you treated the beliefs of the Chamorro people of Guam--both indigenous beliefs and Christian beliefs. Can you tell us some more about your approach to faith in this novel?

CK: Ninety-eight percent of Guamanians are Roman Catholic. As you can tell from my story, Old World Catholicism is part of their everyday life, from celebrating village patron saints in processions and fiestas to coming-of-age rites. I can’t imagine anyone writing a book, fiction or nonfiction, about Guam--Chamorros in particular--and not including how Catholicism plays a part in their lives.

I would also like to add that Isamu Seto is a devout Buddhist with Shinto beliefs and practices. Seto’s faith is every bit as vibrant and crucial to his character, culture and survival as Kiko’s Christian faith is in No Surrender Soldier.

YAG: I’m always interested when female authors choose to write from a male POV (and vice versa). What was involved in the creation of the character of Kiko? How did you decide a teenage boy was the right person to tell this story?

CK: From the first draft, Kiko was the main character. I never hesitated or waffled on this. It is Kiko’s story I needed to tell. What was a difficult decision, though, was to finally switch his voice from third to first person. I knew I had to nail the male voice and the Chamorro pidgin English authentically. That was the only scary part.

In my defense of being a woman writing a nearly all male cast, and a strong coming-of-age male book, one, I grew up as my dad’s “boy.” I’m the eldest from my parents’ first marriages, and have four brothers, four to seven years younger than me, from my parents’ second marriages. I lived with my dad, not my mother. So I grew up working on cars, fishing, dredging the lake, helping with fixing plumbing and electrical and fiber-glassing the boat, and building in the workshop. It’s no wonder I didn’t think anything about going into a male-dominated profession like journalism.


Secondly, a lot of male authors write novels with female protagonists and a lot of women authors write novels with male protagonists. What is gender different, though, is that women who write books with male protagonists often hide their gender using initials. Had I known at the beginning of my writing career that I would end up writing middle grade and young adult novels with strong male protagonists and themes, then I possibly would have used my childhood nickname, Chris. But I couldn’t have known. I believe teen guys are smart enough to care more about the story than the gender of the storyteller. After all, it didn’t stop them from reading a certain male protagonist book written by a female author who went by her initials J.K.!

YAG: Thanks, Christine! Readers, if you want to check out NO SURRENDER SOLDIER, you can find it on Amazon here or enter to win a copy on Goodreads here. There's also a giveaway going on at the OneFourKidLit blog, here. Both giveaways last until the end of January.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

YA Guy Hosts... Jimena Novaro's BLUE RABBIT Blog Tour!

Today, YA Guy is distinctly honored to be hosting Jimena Novaro, whose debut novel, BLUE RABBIT, comes out on December 28th! A talented writer and a thoughtful reader, in today's guest post Jimena weighs in on gender bias and flawed characters. At the end of the post, there's a chance to win one of five free copies of BLUE RABBIT.

And now... Here's Jimena!

What a Bitch: Female Protagonists

Thank you so much for hosting me, Josh! Hello, readers of Josh’s blog--thanks for stopping by!

Sometimes it seems like male characters can get away with anything.

The world of fiction is full of men who win the admiration of thousands of readers and viewers through their charm, charisma, or some other likeability factor while committing some annoying or outright terrible acts. Sometimes it’s just basic layered characterization, as is the case with Thorin from The Hobbit, a complex character with a lot of darkness who makes some tragic decisions. Sometimes it toes the morality line pretty drastically, such as Damon Salvatore from The Vampire Diaries, who spends a lot of time murdering, raping, and mind-controlling people and still has legions of fans.

On the other hand, finding a female character that people won’t call some disparaging thing or other seems hopeless. If she’s too assertive, she’s a bitch. If she’s too kind and accommodating, she’s a pushover. If she complains, she’s whiny. If she’s stoic and determined, she’s unbelievable. And if she’s sort of in the middle, she’s bland.

Sure, people complained about how whiny Harry was in Order of the Phoenix, but it didn’t exactly hurt the book’s or series’ popularity. On the other hand, take Fire by Kristin Chasore, which portrays the much shorter-lived (and less shouty) angst of the female protagonist and gets criticized for it right and left.

Sadly, the truth is that in real life, it can be a pretty similar situation. There are some nigh-impossible standards set for girls and women to follow in terms of looks and behavior. Just think of how many times a girl or woman is called a “slut” for leading a sexual life that, if she were male, would be perfectly acceptable.

So when I sat down to write my book and discovered just how flawed my female protagonist was, I started to worry. Would she turn readers off? Erika’s a high-maintenance, self-centered, self-righteous kind of girl. She makes some pretty bad mistakes that almost cost her friendships--and friends’ lives. One of her friends, Sandra, who gets almost as much page time as Erika does, is right up there with Erika in terms of flaws. All told, they’re both antiheroes.

Let’s consider that word, “antihero.” Who’s the first character fitting that description that pops into your mind? It’s probably a guy. In fact, I remember quite a few articles on writing romance that remind you that, while it’s okay to write a flawed hero, you shouldn’t make your heroine as flawed, because readers have less patience with heroines in general. And I don’t think that applies only to the romance genre.

I still think Erika and Sandra might turn some readers off, some of whom wouldn’t mind as much if they were boys. Sure, I wouldn’t jump at the opportunity of being their friend in real life, but I wouldn’t want to be Thorin’s friend, either, and I still love him as a character. I tried to portray Erika and Sandra as human beings with real flaws that got in the way of their lives, just like the rest of us, which gives them something to learn , something to struggle with, and possibly something to overcome. And isn’t that what characters are supposed to do, whether they’re male or female?

Thanks, Jimena! Now, readers, why not go ahead and add BLUE RABBIT to your Goodreads shelf? By doing so, you'll be entering a drawing to receive one of five free copies of the book!

About BLUE RABBIT

In Knoxville, Tennessee, there’s a bridge to another world.

When they first cross it, Erika and her friends feel like they’ve stumbled into a dream. Magical and mysterious, the other world becomes their little paradise, a place to explore and escape from their everyday lives. Until one night a boy from school, Mike, follows them to the other side--and he’s kidnapped by strange and powerful Creatures.

Back home, everyone thinks Erika and the gang are responsible for Mike’s disappearance. The dream has become a nightmare. How can they negotiate with these Creatures to rescue Mike and clear their names? And why are the Creatures fixated on Erika, who feels drawn to their world even as she senses the danger?




About Jimena:

Jimena Novaro always knew she would be a writer. It just took her a few years to realize that she wanted to do it full-time, and relegate things like going into outer space and being an opera prima donna to hobbies. She loves reading and writing science fiction, fantasy, and YA. A self-proclaimed geeky sort of nerd, she spends a lot of her time fangirling over her favorite shows, books, and bands and educating herself about super-important topics such as how to survive an arrow wound and whether or not you can shoot a gun in space. Sometimes she gets super serious and rants about some socio-political issue or other.

She’s a member of the awesome fantasy authors group Mystic Quills. You can find her free epic fantasy serial, The Withering Sword, on her website (a new chapter comes out every Sunday!). Her first book, Blue Rabbit, a YA urban fantasy, comes out this December! Find her here:





Friday, September 13, 2013

YA Guy Talks about What He Means by "Boy Books"

In the past several months, there's been a lot of online activity concerning gender issues in YA literature. There have been attacks on "strong female characters," as well as critiques of the concept of "boy books" versus "girl books." Seems like every time I check the Twitter feed, there's a new piece on gender in YA.

If you're YA Guy (which I am), you're cheered by all of this activity. I founded this blog because I believe we need to be talking not only about how and why teenage boys and girls read, but about gender stereotypes in YA, industry pressures to market books as "boy" or "girl" books, and so on. These issues are important for those who read and write YA, and they're important for those trying to construct a more just society.

But I also believe that we need to be careful in our discussion of these issues. It's too easy to react in a knee-jerk fashion, to produce stereotypes of our own in our quest to attack the stereotypes of others. For every essay concluding that "boys don't read 'girl books' because they inherently don't like 'girl stuff'" (i.e., they're hardwired not to), there's an essay arguing that when we talk about "boy books," "what we really mean are books that make women second-class characters: love interests for male MCs or damsels to be rescued or the unattainable object of attraction." The first blogger argues with unabashedly circular logic that "girl books" can't be enjoyed by boys because, well, they're girl books.  The second blogger caricatures "boy books" (and those who read, write, and write about them) as hopeless troglodytes.

In my view, neither of these approaches will get us far.

For the record, when I talk about "boy books"--and when I write them myself--I don't mean any of the above. I don't mean books that appeal to the unique wiring of boy brains, and neither do I mean books that teach boys to demean and brutalize women. I mean, simply, books that can be read and enjoyed by boys. Such books, I believe, can and do have male as well as female protagonists; they can and do involve both hetero- and homosexual love stories (or no love story at all); they can and do have female characters who are as complex, flawed, and capable of growth and empowerment as the male characters.

When I talk about boy books, in other words, I'm asking why books such as I've described above are typically not thought of as boy books.

The question of whether teenage boys lag behind girls in how much they read has been debated and hyped endlessly, and we're probably no closer to answering that question than we ever were.  (A fairly recent study concludes that boys are reading at the same difficulty level as girls, though this says nothing about whether they're reading at the same rates as girls.) But will we break gender stereotypes by producing new stereotypes? Will we encourage boys to read by portraying those who write books with boys in mind as cavemen? Will we truly open the field of YA literature in gender-inclusive ways if we assume that only gender-exclusive books are being written and marketed for boys?

YA Guy doesn't think so, anyway.